SOLEUROPE  United Kingdom

System Supportability Engineering - SMART Integrated Logistics Support

Mark Willis
HVR Consulting Services Ltd

from the 14th symposium proceedings by courtesy of MIRCE Science Akademy

. General  Mail 
.
16 thMirce Symposium
Prior Meetings and Documents
.Mirce 14 Follow-up
.
Mark Willis Paper
.Abstract
.Summary
.Introduction
.Acquisition S.E.
.Acquisition Process
.Supportability Eng.
.Standards & Gurus
.Bringing
.Life-cycle Fitting
.Bad Name
.#.
Cots
.Loop Weakness
.CLS
.Future
.References
......

COTS

 Up 

During the last several years there has been an increasing tendency to include a significant element of Commercial Off The Shelf items in proposed system solutions. There is also an increasing tendency in Industry to make the statement 'It's COTS so we do not need to do ILS'. We need to dispel that rumour here!

When attempting to apply ILS to a COTS-based system solution it is true to say that ILS is unlikely to make a contribution to the LRU design. The LRU will be offered 'off the shelf'; although one would hope that ILS principles had been applied during the LRU design process. However, in formulating a system solution the role of ILS is to influence the integration of the COTS items into the system - and this is very important.

1 When It Went Wrong

There is a well-known example regarding the manufacturer of Generating Sets. Whilst fulfilling a contract for a customer, this manufacturer integrated a range of COTS items to meet the Generator requirement. However, during the integration design little attempt was made to apply ILS principles.

During acceptance trials of the Generator one of the COTS LRUs kept failing. Indeed, later perusal of the R&M information on this LRU showed that it was less reliable than other system LRUs. However, the design team had integrated this LRU in the Generator such that a significant amount of other LRUs had to be removed before access could be gained to the faulty one. The result of this design error was that MTTR requirement figures could not be met and a number of maintenance failures were induced in the erstwhile serviceable LRUs.

Whilst this anecdote may seem minor, the reality was that the Generator had to undergo a complete re-design, which almost bankrupted the Company. The way in which LRUs are integrated into a system can have a profound effect on the performance and the support of equipment.

2 COTS Support Solutions

Each of the COTS manufacturers will have a suggested support solution - normally Forward to Deep; however, the system design team must not be fooled into thinking that the COTS support solution is the only one available. The overall support solution must pass the operational availability and cost-effectiveness test. Simply, the holistic support solution must be selected based on the effective use of supportability trade off analyses.

 Down 



Download the document
 ACROBAT PDF (73 Ko) 



 General  Mail 

 Mirce 16  Prior Meetings and Documents 

 Mirce 15  Mirce 14  Defence Logistics 2003  Bristol 

 Mirce 14 Follow-up  Mark Willis Paper 

 Abstract  Summary  Introduction  Acquisition S.E.  Acquisition Process  Supportability Eng.  Standards & Gurus  Bringing  Life-cycle Fitting  Bad Name  Cots  Loop Weakness  CLS  Future  References 


last update:  December 27, 2004

.
.
.

Webhost: Agora System